|
KSAT TV covers 281 Prop 12 story |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Saturday, 23 July 2011 |
Link to story here.
The expected objections from MPO & TxDOT bureaucrats have ensued since the grassroots have renewed their call to restore funding to fix 281 (using Prop 12 money) and keep it a freeway, rather than toll our existing road. Just as the MPO changed Wurzbach Pkwy from a toll project back to a free road project (when some stimulus money became available) and cobbled together several pots of money to get it done, the MPO can do the same on 281. To say otherwise is disingenuous. US 281 had gas tax funding to put in overpasses and expand the highway until the MPO decided (July 2004) to turn it into a toll project to make some money to build other area roads (particularly 1604) in a targeted tax. Watch the news coverage here. For more info on the history of the project cost escalation when 281 became a toll road, go to www.281overpassesnow.com.
SA, MPO Get Road Construction WindfallMPO Set To Receive $54 Million.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
, KSAT 12 News Reporter POSTED: Thursday, July 21, 2011
SAN ANTONIO -- The
San Antonio Metropolitan Planning Organization is receiving $54 million
from the state for roadway and bridge construction, part of $3 billion
the legislature authorized of the remaining $5 billion from a referendum
passed by voters in 2007.The local Texas Department of
Transportation has been allocated $90 million. With the new influx of
funds, advocates for Highway 281 are ready to finally finish off the
project and keep it toll-free.
"The opportunity is here. ... It's
way past due to get 281 fixed," said Terri Hall, the founder of
anti-toll group Texans Uniting for Reform and Freedom.
"I think we
are morally obligated to address the great raging need in this county
and it is 281, north of 1604, "said Tommy Adkisson, county commissioner
and chairman of the MPO board.
Board Director Sid Martinez said the money sent to San Antonio would not be enough to cover the cost.
"Unfortunately, the cost is in the $400 million range. This funding is not enough for the project at this time.
"Hall disagrees with the cost estimate."I think the cost estimates have been monkeyed around with, just like our gas tax money," Hall said. She said it was closer to the $200 million to $250 million range and like other road projects, more money could be found."Like rehabilitation and safety money and other areas where they can pull together a lot more money," said Hall.
Adkisson said it would at least be a start.The
money has to be spent by 2013; most of it by 2012. The 281 project is
currently in the middle of a five-year environmental study but Hall said
that it could be completed in the next year.If the MPO board decides to use the $54 million for other projects, one on the top of the list could be Interstate 35.
"Adding auxiliary lanes (which) ease traffic in and out of 35 through exit ramps," Martinez said.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Cintra does damage control upon fears of default |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Saturday, 23 July 2011 |
Link to article here.
By Gordon Dickson
Ft. Worth Star Telegram
In recent weeks, I spent some time researching and reporting on a story that ran in Sunday's Star-Telegram about
the developer of the North Tarrant Express project encountering revenue
problems on a similar toll project in Indiana. During that time, I
repeatedly sought comment from the developer, and ultimately I got a
response, although it was a rather brief email.
This afternoon, the developer, Cintra, posted additional thoughts on
the topic in a news release, which I also received by email. The release
includes quite a bit of new information about Cintra's financing of the
projects, and its comfort level with their soundness. Since it's too
late to get these thoughts into my story, I thought I'd at least post the press release here, so that readers will have access to the supplemental information.
This press release is from the Cintra U.S. headquarters in Austin.
Cintra is a Spanish company but now has significant operations in the
United States.
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
@gdickson
Read more: http://blogs.star-telegram.com/honkin_mad/2011/07/cintra-responds-in-more-detail-about-the-financial-shape-of-the-indiana-toll-road-north-tarrant-expr.html#ixzz1Sy5mRR00
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Pegging gas tax to inflation spells trouble for taxpayers |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Saturday, 23 July 2011 |
Link to article here.
There has been much discussion through the years about raising the gas tax and indexing it to inflation to pay for roads. We've seen interest only from transportation leaders, but there has been no commitment by these same leaders to end the reliance on tolling along with it. We've said all along, end the diversions of the gas tax to non-road purposes and put the lid on tolling first before there's ANY discussion about raising the gas tax. Indexing would mean automatic tax increases without limit using an index highly manipulated by the government (who benefits from the automatic tax increase). If fiscal discipline as it pertains to our current road taxes (gas taxes and vehicle sales taxes, too, which get dumped into general revenue and don't go to roads either) were restored, a fixed gas tax increase should be considered, not one pegged to inflation. But methinks if fiscal discipline were instituted, we wouldn't need to raise taxes to get our roads fixed since the vehicle sales tax represents $2-3 BILLION/yr, state gas tax diversions represent a billion a year, and billions more at the federal level.
Intellectual Dishonesty in Washington
Posted: Sunday, July 17th, 2011 at 10:20 am
By: Ken Bennight, San Antonio Tea Party
The United States is running up debt to previously unimaginable
levels, and that debt is rapidly becoming impossible to repay. A
technique countries have historically used to deal with excessive debt
is to inflate the currency, thus making the debt cheaper to repay. Of
course that works only so long as your creditors let you denominate your
debt in a currency you control. How long before our external debt will
have to be denominated in Chinese Renminbis, Saudi Riyals, or some other
currency?
But the United States faces a more immediate problem in using
inflation to mitigate the debt. Many U.S. obligations are indexed so
that the obligations increase as inflation increases. Fortunately for
Washington and unfortunately for America, that is a minor inconvenience.
Just as the U.S. government controls inflation, it also controls the
measure of inflation, the consumer price index. Washington can reduce
increases in inflation-indexed obligations by manipulating how the
consumer price index is calculated.
That’s already been done to some extent. If we still measured
inflation as we did in 1980, the present inflation rate reported by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics would be much higher than it is. According to
a recent report by Dow Jones Newswire, Congress is considering again
manipulating the calculation of the consumer price index to further
reduce the reported inflation rate. Reducing the reported inflation
rate, of course, has no effect on the actual inflation rate.
In pushing this proposal, Congressman piously speak of getting a more
accurate picture of inflation’s true effect. But given that reducing
the reported rate makes Congressmen’s lives easier, it’s hard to believe
there’s no self interest involved. Are any of us, Captain Renault-like,
shocked!, shocked! to discover that even the computation of the
consumer price index is corrupted by politics?
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Tollways to lack word 'toll' in their name |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Saturday, 23 July 2011 |
Link to article here.
These Regional Mobility Authorities are TOLL authorities, yet they lack the name in their titles, on purpose. Now their tollways lack the word as well in yet another deceptive way of getting more people to pay the CTRMA's toll taxes (likely only temporarily until motorists get their first bill with hundreds of dollars in fees and fines tacked onto it -- the norm with toll agencies in Texas).
A tollway by any other name
Ben Wear: Getting There
Austin American Statesman
Updated: 8:15 p.m. Sunday, July 3, 2011
Published: 7:33 p.m. Sunday, July 3, 2011
The big transportation news of the day is that you won't be
tempted to get caught in a downtown traffic jam for fireworks tonight.
No fireworks, no jam. But in honor of the day, a couple of transportation tidbits: Austin,
unlike some cities, has never been much for slapping names on its
highways. We tend to stick with the numerical designations that God and
TxDOT gave the roads in the first place. But your Central Texas Regional
Mobility Authority (note that the word "toll" does not appear in its
name) is trying to change that. Already, it has begun to call its
under-construction toll road on U.S. 290 East the "Manor Expressway."
Not tollway, expressway. We'll see how that catches on when the
turnpike's first section opens in a couple of years. Sometime back, the
authority also began to refer to its planned expansion of U.S. 183 in
East Austin (which will have tolls on the main lanes) as the "Bergstrom
Expressway." The trend is expanding. There is now, in
concept, an "Oak Hill Expressway," meaning the short section where U.S.
290 West and Texas 71 meet that in a few years might be a tollway. The
agency board voted last week to pay a consultant about $750,000 to
manage that coming project. The board also approved $2 million for
similar work, referred to as the "Manchaca Expressway," which you might
know as Texas 45 Southwest. Which will also be a toll road. As of
now, the only Austin highway with a commonly used nickname is MoPac
Boulevard (Loop 1), which is named after a defunct railroad company.
Using that as a guide, perhaps Texas 71 East to Smithville and La Grange
should become the Chicken Ranch Expressway.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Cintra spokesperson sings sunshine to Seguin about its privatized SH 130 |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Saturday, 23 July 2011 |
Link to article here.
Cintra-Zachry spokesperson, Victoria Miller, is already misleading the public. She said TxDOT sets the toll rate when that's not true. Cintra sets the toll rate based on an approved formula that can be highly manipulated based on what Cintra says its operating costs are. Then Miller tried to act concerned appearing to agree that I-10 needs to be widened, when a non-compete agreement signed by TxDOT restricts and can even prohibit the expansion of free roads surrounding Cintra's tollway. "Competing" free roads threaten Cintra's guaranteed profits. This is what Rick Perry has wrought upon the state of Texas....foreign-owned toll roads where the private investors are granted government-sanctioned monopolies over our public roads.
A savvy member of the audience brought out one of the key issues surrounding the SH 130 tollway boondoggle: why would trucks want to incur the cost of paying expensive tolls to take a road around Austin that's a much longer route? Her answer makes no sense. Current traffic patterns on the first four segments and basic economics tell us truckers WILL NOT take SH 130, despite TxDOT lowering the truck toll rate to try and incentivize truckers to take its failing toll road that's running with red ink. When the Cintra segments 5 & 6 open, we can expect the same.
Official answers questions about SH 130 By Bob Thaxton Seguin Gazette July 7, 2011
SEGUIN — A wide variety of questions about State Highway 130
were answered Wednesday during the monthly membership meeting and
luncheon hosted by the Seguin Area Chamber of Commerce at the
Seguin-Guadalupe County Coliseum. Guest speaker for the luncheon was Victoria Miller, director of
corporate affairs and public information coordinator for the SH 130
Concession Company.
A joint venture of Cintra, a multinational company based in
Spain and Zachry American Infrastructure, headquartered in San
Antonio, the SH 130 Concession Company is building segments 5 and
6, the southernmost sections of the 90-mile toll highway running
from Interstate 35 near Georgetown to Interstate 10 east of
Seguin. “We’re hoping that the road will be done by the end of 2012,”
Miller said. After delivering a brief description of the project, she opened
the proceedings to questions from the audience. |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Chance to fix Hwy 281 without tolls |
|
Written by Terri Hall
|
|
Thursday, 21 July 2011 |
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Chance to fix 281 without tolls
MPO to vote on Prop 12 allocation Monday
(San Antonio, TX, July 21, 2011) The 82nd Texas Legislature
authorized the remaining $3 billion in Prop 12 bonds to be issued for
road and bridge projects. The MPO will be voting on which projects will
receive Prop 12 money at its policy board meeting on Monday. The
criteria for Prop 12 money is that it must fund a project listed in the
top 50 of the 100 Most Congested Roadways list.
Here's a link to the 100 Most Congested Roadways list where US 281 is #38: http://apps.dot.state.tx.us/apps/rider56/list.htm
Loop
1604 from SH 16 to FM 471, US 281 north of Loop 1604, and two segments
of I-35 (from Loop 353 to 281 and from FM 1518 to Loop 1604) would meet
that criteria.
“We know all of these projects are important and
need to be addressed. The question is, in what order? We're asking the
MPO to allocate Prop 12 money to US 281 first since it was previously
funded with gas taxes for 7 years in the MPO's plan before they spent it
elsewhere, and thousands of San Antonians have repeatedly asked that it
be done without tolls,” advocates Terri Hall, Founder/Director of TURF.
Rep. Lyle Larson
served on the MPO when he was a Bexar County Commissioner and said that
projects that were previously funded that get bumped for any reason
should be the first ones funded again when money becomes available.
Since US 281 already had funding identified in MPO plans from roughly
2001 to 2008, TURF believes it ought to be the first project in the
pipeline to receive Prop 12 funds now.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|